Readings from the book The Danish Illusion by Flemming Blicher
Will Novo Nordisk be the next vaccine giant?
The Danish Ministry of Health and the Danish Corona Corruption
(Part 2 - continued from previous section)
It can therefore be seen that one does not have to be a very critical thinker to see the pattern in this whole charade, as the cards can can be summarised as follows:
• Per Okkels is apperantly asked to knock his health director into place, allegedly because director Søren Brostrøm is not supportive enough about the government's corona narrative, explicitly expressed in “the extreme precautionary principle”. Okkels is likely asked by one or more non-publicly known backers – possibly the prime minister, a head of department from the prime minister's office, a minister for health and the elderly or a fourth person – Or are we to believe that Okkels does the knocking completely on his own initiative?
• Half a year later, Per Okkels gets a golden ticket to a comfortable and lucrative transition to his pension via a part-time position in the incredibly rich Novo Nordisk Foundation
• This is a smart move to hide this wrongdoing, as the new head of department cannot be blamed for the deviation from professionalism and deviation from the 'proportionality principle', which has probably subsequently already become commonplace practice in the Ministry of Health. Per Okkels cannot be blamed either, or at least wont experience any repercussions, as he has retired.
• In addition, Per Okkels' new organisation is the Novo Nordisk Foundation which suddenly, from March 2022 and less than twelve months after Okkels joined the foundation, embarks upon major development work together with Bill Gates on the development of new antiviral medicine. Not insulin as is the company’s field of expertise, but antiviral medicine!
• The project is called "Pandemic Antiviral Discovery" (PAD) and aims to catalyse discovery and early development of antiviral drugs for use in future pandemics. PAD is used for the development of vaccines, even though the word 'vaccines' is not mentioned at all, neither in the Novo Nordisk Foundation’s nor the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's press releases. The project raises 90 million dollars (600 million danish kroner) in 2022 for their vaccine adventure and a triple amount (1,8 billion danish kroner) in 2024.
• In the meantime, the Danish Medicines Agency's director Thomas Senderovitz has also switched to Novo Nordisk after ensuring that the first COVID-19 vaccines are approved for emergency use in Denmark. Also in that position, it offers certain advantages that there is a change of director, so that any responsibility becomes more difficult to place when the population begins to understand that these vaccines were planned right before the corona outbreak in Wuhan. The responsible backers are trying to muddy the picture, so as to make any eventual legal responsibility much more difficult to place. In this termite’s nest of deception, try to get the average Dane to think about who can be held responsible for what happened? Quite difficult, isn’t it?
Even Søren Broström has after all just followed an order from his head of department and probably got a hint with a red-hot poker to join in the charade. In addition, that same Autumn, Brostrøm was offered a top WHO position to boot. Dagens Medicin writes that, on the 28th of October 2020, Søren Brostrøm will, from May 2021 become part of WHO's global board. Even the minister who is responsible for what is going on seems to be quite happy reaping the fruits of his ill-gotten labours.
Health Minister Magnus Heunicke will be honoured by Berlingske and Kantar Gallup in July 2021 as the most popular minister in the government that sat until the general election of 1st of November 2022, more than a year and a half after the start of the corona escapade. Following this, Heunicke also secured another ministerial post in the scandalous SVM (coalition) government of December 2022.
As described above, the Danish health authorities have, from the early start of the corona pandemic, emphasised politics over professionalism. Previously I described how the responsibility for the scandal will be difficult to place, and that those involved are thus relatively well-protected against negative consequences and possible criminal charges because of their participation. Furthermore, the industry is owned by the same company-rich elite, regardless of which industry we are talking about. As long as there are pandemics, crises and wars, this elite makes a lot of money at the expense of the world's population. The corruption works so subtly in today’s Danish politics that the parties to the shady ventures do not even need to exchange suspicious thick envelopes containing large banknotes under mahogany tables. With a barely concealed ironic allusion to my previous section on the mobile networks, the described corruption can be called a type of corruption (almost second-generation corruption, if you like) where the envelopes of money may be the original first-generation corruption. Second-generation corruption is a much more subtle corruption, which I believe to be a prevailing form of corruption that is increasingly now taking place in Denmark. With regards to prime minister Mette Frederiksen’s and the then minister of health and the elderly Magnus Heunicke's roles in this case, I will return to this at the end of the next chapter.
When I touch on corruption, the pandemic and the WHO, I must also address Bill Gates' involvement in the WHO. This is because it is a deeply fascist form of corruption that is unfolding before our noses of all of us when a single person has so much power over the entire world's population. Fascism is precisely when the two factors, the political power and the economic power of industry, are mixed together to provide a power factor where it is the dictator, and in our case the government, who has the formal power. Even one of the foremost proponents of fascism, Italy's dictator Benito Mussolini, has stated that fascism could rightly be called 'corporatism'. In the case of Italy, it was primarily the trade unions and the opposition parties, who were forced to hand over all their power to the dictator Mussolini. On local-national plan here in Denmark, what the country has gone through since 2020 is precisely that corporatism has centred all power around the government. When the citizen finds it more and more difficult to identify where the state begins and where it ends, then it indicates that fascism is ‘at it again’ to get a good hold of us after World War II and an eighty-year grace-period. Mette Frederiksen stated in her New Year's speech on 1st of January 2021: "Long live research and collaboration between public and private, long live science!”
This is clearly in total support of a fascist state, but so subtly worded as to be almost oblivious to the average Dane celebrating New Year… It is also completely in line with the agreement that Denmark entered into with the WEF in 2018 – the “Frame Agreement” which obliges Denmark to expand its private/public partnership. (PPP)
However, before I come back to the local Danish national level, let’s put a critial gaze upon just a few things; Corporatism, the WHO, the Pandemic and the involvement therein of a philanthropist called Bill Gates. Let us also ask the question: Who has the real power in the WHO? The top person in this organisation is the General Secretary and what do the stakeholders in the organisation expect from him? The stakeholders must be the 193/194 countries who are the members of the WHO and have outsourced parts of their health systems. They have handed the assessment of the whether or not there is a pandemic directly over to the WHO and together the decision as to how the agreement with the vaccine manufacturers activates. Here, enormous sums will change hands over a short period of time, because this is how the contracts with the pharmaceutical companies are written, most likely completely deliberately. It is unfortunately not the representatives of the countries who control the WHO in a democratic manner. Among the myriad of small and large sponsors, Bill Gates represents indisputably the largest share and therefore, by infererence, he controls the WHO. If one controls the WHO, like Bill Gates, and if you abuse this concentrated political power that one thereby has, then you also control the largest part of the world's population in the case of a declared pandemic.
This is at least until the populations wise up and cancel the contract which the 193/194 countries have signed with the WHO. Denmark became a member of the United Nations (UN) at its foundation in 1945 and then automatically de facto became a member of the WHO in 1948 when this was founded as a part of the UN. In the case of a pandemic, we can now see that the WHO has enormous influence on what is going to happen in each individual country. We also saw this in Denmark, as not one single Danish authority recommended locking Denmark down following 11th of March 2020. So therefore, we must naturally surmise that the only internal Danish organisation with enough clout was the Monarchy which gave this recommendation. Indeed, this is unlikely but not entirely impossible - except the Monarchy is not a health authority. After all, it is entirely clear and we know that neither the SSI (Medicine Institute of the State), the Health Authority or even the Medicinal Authority recommended the locking down of Denmark. So who did?
On the other hand the WHO has, since March 2020, recommended tough lock-downs and aggressive testing strategies. This was also pointed out in an article in "Berlingske" (A Danish mainstream paper) from 24th of March 2020, which has this unequivocal headline: "WHO issues warnings now: Denmark will be locked down for months without changing to aggresive testing strategy". The WHO has not had any Danish sovereign power transferred to itself as is the case with the EU. Still, mistakenly, many Danes, and politicians, have the understanding that the WHO has sovereignty over Denmark in just the same way as the EU has. However, in the case of the EU, sovereignty has been transferred legally, as the Grundlov, the Danish Constitution, prescribes. This transfer of sovereignty has even been done to such a high degree - many will despair to realise - that the EU overrules the Folketing as a law-making power in Denmark.
It is my opinion that the politicians in the Folketing, especially those with a certain degree of power, heads of parties, spokespersons, commitee chairs and of course ministers, are controlled by powers that lie in the background. Therefore I think that it is completely deliberate that the politicians seek to influence the Danes in believing that Denmark is, in legal terms, under the control of the WHO, which Denmark is not (yet). The country has never had a referendum about membership of the UN / WHO as we have had about the EU. The Grundlov clearly rules such that in paragraph 19 and 20 a referendum is required if Denmark is to hand over any kind of sovereignty. The fact is that the WHO has attemped to take the sovereignty over Denmark, and the rest of the member states, in the case when there is, once more, declared a pandemic. Well, that is another story which is important to keep an eye on. It is a subject which one of my American friends and collaborators James Roguski has invested countless hours, videos and interviews on informing us about. It is not a simple task he has undertaken, as the WHO is attempting two seperate strategies:
One is a completely new pandemic treaty and the other is legally binding additions to the existing IHR agreement which Denmark entered into in 2007. James Roguski writes very tangibly about the WHO's plans and progress on his Substack homepage. I have interviewed James Roguski several times about the WHO's plans. In the interviews James Roguski goes through how the WHO makes use of a pandemic treaty and amendments to the existing IHR treaty to gain greater power over the member states.
However, let us return to Bill Gates. How can we legitimately claim that it is Bill Gates who controls the WHO? It is in fact very simple to prove for all who have access to the internet. On the website of the WHO can be found the numbers from the largest sponsors. In 2020-2021 Bill Gates donated more than 17% of WHO's entire yearly budget. In the period 2018-2019 his total donations were almost 19% and in 2016-2017 they were above 22%. This is not fiction for these figures can easily be verified by visiting the website open.who.org where you can add the donation from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation together with that from the GAVI Alliance, which is a vaccine alliance' founded and dominated by, guess who? - Bill Gates.
However, while most people are likely of the opinion that the WHO is controlled by its member states who pay donations to the organisation, the reality is that one of the world's richest, if not the richest, man has a dominating influence on the WHO as its largest sponsor. Besides which it is also worth noting that Bill Gates donated more than 22% to the organisation in the budget period when the current General Secretary Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus was elected.
#5 - Novo Nordisk - Maybe a new vaccine giant is born out of government corruption? (part 2)