Nobel awarded scientist declares the PCR test useless for detecting viral disease
Another Nobel Laureate, Kary Mullis, has also helped expose the many lies that, let's call it the ‘mainstream narrative’, has used during the coronavirus pandemic.
Biochemist Kary Mullis won a Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR test used to diagnose the HIV virus in AIDS patients. Before his death, he went to great lengths to state that the PCR test cannot be used therapeutically. In a video available on Odysee, he explains why the PCR test cannot tell us anything meaningful about whether the tested person is sick with a virus in connection with a positive PCR test.
Unfortunately, Mullis died in August 2019, officially from pneumonia. This happened at a very convenient time for those who make money using the PCR test to test for corona. It is therefore important to emphasise that Kary Mullis has at no point made any specific statements about the PCR test and the corona pandemic, as he died before the pandemic. Instead, he has stated unequivocally that the PCR test cannot be used to test for diseases caused by viruses, for example.
The PCR test is also very conveniently used by politicians who want to use the corona pandemic to shut down societies and take control of the population, as happened in Denmark during the lockdowns in 2020 and 2021. Here, the population was put at bay with the primary reason being that the number of infections was increasing, and the PCR test was used as an argument to declare many people sick without them being affected by the virus or disease in any way.
Danish Associate Professor Emeritus Niels Harrit at the University of Copenhagen has created a 54-minute lesson in which he goes into great detail about how the PCR test works and the theory behind it. The lesson was videotaped and posted on YouTube, and Harrit explains the DNA and RNA theory behind the PCR test and why it cannot be used to test for COVID-19 disease as a result of a coronavirus attack. He also explains why it is called the RT-PCR test, where RT stands for both ‘Real Time’ and ‘Reverse Transcript’.
As both Kary Mullis and Niels Harrit have validated, you can vary the number of cycles when performing a PCR test. And the higher the number of cycles, the higher the probability of finding coronavirus, for example. However, a positive test result does not indicate that the test subject is sick with coronavirus or any other virus.
The “Quick Test” (lateral flow test) is even more useless
According to the Danish Health Authority, the so-called antigen tests, also known as the quick test, rapid test and self-test, are less accurate than the PCR test.
If the inventor deems the PCR test useless for diagnosing coronavirus disease, and the Danish Health Authority states that the antigen test is less reliable than the PCR test, then why are politicians and health authorities so keen on testing for COVID-19 and basing their pandemic-fighting decisions on the results of testing the population? Could it be because politicians and health authorities are in the pocket of the giant pharmaceutical industry?
On 16 February 2022, Politiken wrote an article about how poor these rapid tests are under the title ‘The worst test only caught 2.5 percent of those infected’. Although not all of the 46 different variants of rapid tests tested are quite as inaccurate as the worst one according to the article, it illustrates the Wild West market we are dealing with.
It's also important to realise that if the authorities hadn't had the PCR and antigen tests to push out news of increased infection rates, we would hardly have had a scenario in Denmark that could be called anything close to a pandemic.
I will discuss these dubious testing tools in more detail in a later section about the war-profiteering, longtime friends with the Danish King and deeply immoral businessman, Jeppe Handwerk, who, like the Falck Group, has earned staggering amounts of money selling tests to Danish authorities.
Nobelitis - The Nobel disease
Of course, it's hard for Big Pharma when Nobel Prize winners like Kary Mullis and Luc Montagnier reveal their profit-driven theatre tricks.
So what does Big Pharma do? Well, they get some of their paid minions to slander the scientists in question to undermine their credibility. In the case of Kary Mullis and Luc Montagnier, they have both been unofficially diagnosed with Nobel disease, or Nobelitis.
Apparently, it's a disease that affects Nobel Prize winners who become a little too critical of the mainstream narrative.
Although there are officially no names of those who carry out this vile diagnosis, Wikipedia does see itself fit to publish an entire article mentioning Kary Mullins and Luc Montagnier among half a dozen other Nobel dissidents.
Propaganda comes in many more variants than coronavirus.
If you do not feel like becoming a paid monthly subscriber, but want to support my work, you can buy me a cup of coffee for aprrox. 5 USD/35 DKK(click HERE!):
Links:
Odysee video. Kary Mullis, inventor of the PCR test, explains that the PCR test cannot be used to identify viruses:
https://odysee.com/@action4canada:a/05-Kary-Mullis-Inventor-of-the-PCR-Test:f
Niels Harrit, chemist, lic.scient. and Associate Professor Emeritus at the University of Copenhagen about the PCR test (in Danish):
https://youtu.be/9IEhEaFgCI8
Politiken 16 February 2022 ‘The worst test only caught 2.5 percent of those infected’ (in Danish):
https://politiken.dk/forbrugogliv/sundhedogmotion/art8622146/Den-ringeste-test-fangede-kun-25-pct.-af-de-smittede
WayBack Machine copy of Danish Health Authority’s homepage discussing PCR and antigen tests: https://web.archive.org/web/20221219090201/https://www.sst.dk/da/corona/Test-symptomer-og-tidlig-behandling/Hvornaar-anbefales-test/Typer-af-test-du-kan-bruge
Wikipedia article on Nobel Disease:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_disease
BigThink article on September 15, 2023 “Nobel disease: Why some of the world’s greatest scientists eventually go crazy:
https://bigthink.com/the-past/nobel-disease-great-scientists-go-crazy/
Share this post