Notice of Liability and Liability Claims
At the beginning of 2020 I experienced a sudden awakening to reality in relation to corruption in our world and inside Danish politics, whether this was a minister, an authority or an NGO, as well as international politics; EU, UN, WHO, WEF, etc.. I decided to take part in doing something about it. Firstly, I wanted to help expose the deceit and secondly I wanted to find solutions. As an engineer, I am trained in and have a good knowledge of the area of electronics and radio waves, and I have, as previously mentioned, worked for six years for the world's largest telecom company Ericsson. I therefore assumed that my contribution would be within my area of expertise. If you do not know what a smart meter is, then your house has, with 99% certainty, already had one installed, as these new socalled smart meters replace the analogue rotating disc power meters that measure the electricity consumption in a household. During my time as an activist in relation to electromagnetic radiation from smart phones, smart meters and 5G, I encountered an organisation which was trying to help the people solve the problem related to electromagnetic radiation (EMR). This organisation was the Inpower Movement. The film-maker Josh del Sol has made an award-winning documentary about Inpowers activities, which is centered around a Notice of Liability (NoL), that are making the perpetrating people in power, and their mindless minions, responsible in a legal way for their crimes against the common people.
…Notice of Liability (NoL), that are making the perpetrating people in power, and their mindless minions, responsible in a legal way for their crimes against the common people.
Inspired by Josh Del Sol's video and the founder of the Inpower Movement, Cal Washington, plus in particular two Danish sovereign advocates, I created an NoL in Danish which, in September 2020, was sent to all the members of the Danish parliament. This was done with the help from a lot of people, who also made donations making it possible to send the 170 ‘signed for’ letters with the NoLs to each individual politician. At the time I was collaborating with an organisation called Denmark Awakes (Danmark Vågner), which was headed by a certain Jette Toft. On their website you can view the names of all the members of the Danish parliament and mayors in Denmark, who have all received the NoL, and who has all signed for receiving the NoL by post, as the NoL has to be sent by recommended post, at least that is how we do it in Denmark. This was important in order to make them culpably responsible for putting smart meters in peoples homes and permitting the rollout of the 5G technology in Denmark. Included with the NoL they also received sufficient knowledge and information about smart meters and 5G to garner an understanding that the technology used in both instances is a crime against humanity. The NoL is quite a thorough document that makes the receiver of it commit to a self-executing contract. It is a legal jiu-jitsu way of handling the criminalities done by the people in power towards the common people. It is essentially a legal action done in total self-defence. Even so, the receiver of the NoL always ends up with large bills often amounting to hundreds of thousands to millions of US dollars that the receiver owes the sender of the NoL bill.
When a point is reached when people will no longer suffer damage and abuse by the people in power, all the receivers of NoL - for instance a lot of politicians and government officials and other civil servants - will no longer be able to claim that they had not been aware that there was a problem so that they can’t claim ignorance. I strongly encourage you to join the Inpower team in your country and start sending NoLs to the perpetrators there. If Inpower has not yet established a presence in your country then I recommend that you contact Inpower and offer your help in setting up Inpower in your country, just like I participated in setting up Inpowers Danish organisation and in finishing the Danish version of the NoL.
The NoL itself will make sure that a large part of the most evil and inhuman people in power - those who participate in invoking totalitarian measures on the people - will feel their consequences of their criminal actions. The NoL has been developed into a very comprehensive document that is near to impossible to neglect by the receiver. As the sender have proof through the post services registering of receipt, the sender of the NoL can always prove that the receiver did indeed receive the NoL. That is important as that makes it easy to establish that the perpetrators were made aware of the perpetrating actions they have participated in, and thereby have been made responsible for their cruel deeds. I am of course hoping, along with thousands of other representatives from the common people, that the perpetrators one day will be charged for their atrocities. When that day comes, the NoL is possibly the best legal evidence lying ready at hand for possible legal action.
It is a tad bit ironic for me that I have learned so much from the Inpower Movement, but the knowledge I gained also have had the consequence that I no longer spent so much of my energy on the activism related to 5G and EMR. I still get contacted by people who want different forms of advice and help with smart meters, electromagnetic radiation and 5G towers. Cal Washington and his Inpower Movement opened my eyes to how extensive the deceit that the world's power elite are pushing on the people. Consequently I found it necessary that I gave my 5G activism a break. I felt I had to make a decision in relation to the use of my limited resources where they would have the most impact. The challenge to persuade the Danish population and the authorities that 5G is dangerous seemed many times greater than the challenge of exposing the deceit relating to the corona virus.
So this is why I decided towards the end of 2020 to turn my focus from the 5G and EMR activism to a wider political perspective. I then also became convinced that the corona hoax and the lack of safety in relation to 5G and EMR were inseparably connected. This is also why Inpower Movement have created a NoL for three different areas: Smart Meter (Trespassing Technology), 5G and Vaccines. Even a fourth NoL is on the way dealing with geoengineering/chemtrails.
In the autumn of 2020 I copied the thinking behind Inpowers NoL to use some of the same tactics to a more basic local Danish liability claim regarding the 5G roll-out, a much lighter document than Inpowers NoL. The aim was to apply immediate liability to participants in the state sponsored terrorising of the Danes. By omitting any financial implications (as is the case with Inpower Movements NoL) on the perpetrators, it becomes a lot easier, cheaper and less time consuming to send the liability claim to a wide range of perpetrators. Even without the financial implications it is merely a document that makes sure the receiver cannot claim that they were not aware of the bad decisions they have undertaken whilst participating in the overreach of power. Amongst the receivers of the Danish liability claim are ninety-eight mayors in all the local council districts of Denmark. Along with these mayors all the participating politicians and key civil servants of the Danish government have likewise received a liability claim making a lot of substantial legal evidences ready for a hopefully future legal showdown. In such a case none of the perpetrators are able to say that they did not know what they had participated in. The Danish liability claim helps declare that these criminals can be held responsible, and that we know that they are now informed so they also explicitly know that what they are doing is causing harm to other human beings. So when for instance a minister of health receives our Danish liability claim he or she will have a greater motivation to refrain from further criminal actions and from participating in the corona hoax at large. Indeed, the NoL’s and liability claims do promote the expression ‘they can run, or ignore, but they can’t hide.’
Besides, it will be so much easier to convict the guilty in the arising court cases as ignorance cannot be claimed. As a reminder, to claim ignorance was exactly what the supporters of the Nazis did when the Germans had capitulated after the second world war. Almost an entire nation - directly or indirectly - supported the German National Socialist Party and the party leader Adolf Hitler. However, after the war many Germans claimed that they had not supported Nazism nor Hitler and that they were ignorant of the horrors in the concentration camps. If NoL’s and liability had been known at the time, they could have been sent to all who took part and they would have been liable and not able to claim ignorance and they would have had a higher chance of being convicted then. As we know from the proceedings in Nuremberg only a handful of Nazis were convicted for their crimes. It is horrific what a perfect analogy the 'corona pandemic' is to the early twentieth century Nazism. The two scenarios have so many similarities; populations are told that the government's assaults and restrictions on human rights are for their own safety, whether it would be Germans invading Poland, Czechoslovakia and/or Denmark or the lock-downs, corona tests, mask-wearings, restrictions of travel, restrictions upon the visitation of family members, corona passports and forced vaccination by way of coercion.
Since the corona hoax unfolded as daunting as it did in 2020, I sensed that a Danish 5G and smart meter liability claim was not going far enough. Therefore I got behind a COVID-19 liability claim, which was sent to politicians, civil servants, scientists, doctors and nurses, all who have been involved in creating and enforcing the corona restrictions. This liability claim was put on the website of the Denmark Awakes homepage (www.danmarkvaagner.dk) where it is unfortunately no longer to be found. Also this homepage is now promoting jewish kabbalistic mysticism, which I find rather surprising. I have included a link in the footnotes to a download of the version shown on the following pages. The liability claim is self explanatory; I would however mention that the most important thing in relation to this document, is to make the recipient aware that by merely receiving it, they cannot claim ignorance or deny knowledge about it later. The liability claim contains irrefutable scientific evidence explaining how authorities and individuals have acted in such a criminalised way before, during and after the pandemic.
Link to the original Danish 5G liability claim:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PVlBzvx_uR8Mv34X2WSfHekG-M_FRLdx/view
Below you can find the COVID-19 liability claim which has been translated into English:
Recipient:
_________________________________
_________________________________
_________________________________
_________________________________
_________________________________
Sender:
______________________
______________________
______________________
Date: ________________
COVID-19
Liability claim.
Informed and legally presented.
The receiver of this COVID-19 NoL is hereby notified about their individual responsibility in connection with the planning, rollout and subsequent enforcement of the restrictions and changes in legislation regarding infectious diseases after the outbreak of the disease called COVID-19. These restrictions and changes in legislation result, among other things, in different mandatory behaviours like for example the wearing of masks etc., which, it is scientifically proven, have health-injuring consequences for the person who wears it. It is a fact that women and men in the geographic area called Denmark did not give their consent to these far-reaching restrictions and changes in legislation. Such consent cannot be given for as long as the claims in this NoL have not been completely refuted accompanied by substantial and covering scientific and medical documentation.
Description of the disease
The World Health Organization (WHO) declared on 11th March 2020 that the outbreak of COVID-19 in Wuhan in China had developed into a global pandemic.
COVID-19 is the official name of the disease which a person allegedly is contaminated with by a virus which the Danish Health Authority named 'New Corona Virus'. The virus itself was first named 2019-nCoV becoming renamed to SARS-CoV-2; this, according to the links below from the Institute of Medicines and the Health Authority.
https://www.ssi.dk/sygdomme-beredskab-og-forskning/sygdomsleksikon/c/covid19
https://www.sst.dk/da/corona
Changes to the Law Regarding Epidemics
On 12th March 2020, a united Danish parliament passed, after an emergency procedure, a change to the law regarding epidemics; Law number 28 from 17/03/2020 concerns ‘preparations against contagious diseases and other transmissible diseases. This was later changed through several amendments (BEK 1026 and 1444). These changes in law resulted in far-reaching powers granted to the Minister of Health and the Elderly in connection with an epidemic, with very little consultation with experts in the health sector. These far-reaching powers extended to the police force who can be subordinated by the minister in order to exercise forced treatment, sectioning, isolation and vaccination. The changes in law resulted in an overruling of the constitutional rights of the individual Dane, by overruling the Danish constitutions paragraph 63, which can be read on https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2020/208 - LOV nr 208 17/03/2020.
Legislation Regarding Masks etc.
On 20th August 2020 the Minister of Health and the Elderly, Magnus Heuniche, published the law: BEK nr 1221 from 20/08/2020, ‘Law regarding mandatory mask-wearing on public transport etc.’ This law resulted in the mandatory use of masks on public transport. With the law there are a range of exceptions, which are, by and large, not referred to by the government, parliament, authorities, transport companies, media or the press during the exercising and enforcement of the change in law. The full text can be read on www.retsinformation.dk - BEK 1221.
“We are not Responsible for Errors or Things Missing in this COVID-19 Notice of Liability…”
On 18th September 2020, the Danish Minister of Health and the Elderly, Magnus Heuniche, published new legislation BEK no. 1372 from 18/09/2020 about mandatory mask-wearing in the hospitality sector in connection with the handling of COVID-19. This legislation expired on 5th October 2020, however it was extended until 1st November via further legislation: BEK 1443 and BEK 1460. The legislation mandated the use of face-masks in cafes, restaurants and other venues and it contained, like BEK 1221 a list of exceptions which were not announced by either the government, parliament, authorities, the venues or the press in connection with the enforcement of the legislation. The full law text can be read on below link: https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2020/1372.
The Meaning of the Changed Legislation
The mentioned changes in legislation regarding the face-coverings resulted in short and long term degradations in health condition for any woman, man or child, who had to utilise them. The changes were imposed on the basis that they should improve public health.
It is essential to notice that the law changes contained a list of exceptions and these are important for citizens’ health conditions. However, the exceptions were not sufficiently explained or prioritised resulting in the general message to the public being "Wear the face mask!" Elderly and vulnerable people especially need their oxygen and the company of other people to maintain a healthy life. Indeed, the elderly were already too isolated in Danish society without making things worse for them. These elderly were deprived of their life-line, because of a wildly exaggerated risk of infection with a new alleged ‘virus’, named Sars-Cov-2, which countless doctors the world over has already declared no different from the ‘flu which hits us every winter. However, the way in which the authorities communicated this, with the press and media obediently following them, was to lay the responsibility for the well-being of each person not with themselves, but with every mask-wearing (or not) Dane in Denmark. At the same time the public narrative was to bombard Danes with propaganda-style directions and shaming to make them comply in the wearing of the unhealthy face masks.
As participant, either by producing these changes in legislation, or by taking part in enforcing what contributed to making women, men and children comply with the legislation, the recipient of this COVID-19 NoL is hereby notified of the responsibility that follows the recipient’s active or passive participation in one or several of the mentioned activities.
Claim 1:
That there is NO evidence that Sars-Cov-2 has been isolated in an approved biological laboratory, either in Denmark or abroad; Hereby that there is no official authorised medical or scientific evidence that has been presented to show that the virus exists.
Substantiation of Claim 1
Both the Institute of Medicines and the Health Authority in Denmark have been asked multiple times by different people to deliver the documentation to show that Sars-Cov-2 has been purified and isolated in an approved laboratory. This has, among other things, caused the absurd situation at a press meeting on 29th September 2020 where both the director of the Institute for Medicines, Kåre Mølbak, and the director of the Health Authority, Søren Brostrøm, both denying that there was no documentation, and yet they still have never presented any since.
Here is a link to the press meeting (54 minutes in) https://www.dr.dk/drtv/se/tv-avisen-ekstra_-pressemoede-med-sundhedsministeren-om-corona_214883
Via the link below you can also view the reply to the FOI request which is mentioned in the video. The reply was in short:"The Institute of Medicine of the Danish State can conclude that we do not have the requested documents in our possession". http://www.vp.fo/fileadmin/user_upload/Afgoerelse_Alex_Holmstedt_SAG_20-08162__1_.pdf
On 7th October, the Health Authority received another FOI request which was replied to with a rejection. Their rejection was supported by additional material, links to sources to, for example, the Health Authority, The Institute of Medicines, the WHO and the ECDC. Even though the FOI request is rejected, they still argued that there is a virus, without delivering ANY evidence of it having been purified and isolated in a laboratory. You can read the rejection here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FiA5gf69b7e2UrB_FLzrZTPN-LkLaKs9/view?usp=sharing
The Food and Drugs Administration of the USA, the FDA, write on page 39 in an instruction attached to the so-called RT-PCR tests (document no. CDC-006-00019 from 13th July 2020) which follows: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.”
The name “2019-nCoV” was the original name of the alleged virus, which should cause COVID-19. This translates to say that the FDA admits that the virus has not been isolated. Here is the link: https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
As no Danish authorities, or any authorities around the world, can produce the evidence that Sars-Cov-2 has been clinically purified and isolated, it follows per rationem there is no scientific evidence that the virus even exists, which, according to The Danish Institute of Medicines and the Health Authority, should cause the disease named COVID-19. Until such evidence is presented, the existence of Sars-Cov-2 has not been scientifically proven.
Claim 2:
Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen had no professional medical basis for recommending to parliament that it should instigate the emergency approval changes to the Epidemics Legislation (The Law about precautions against infectious diseases and other transmissible diseases) on 12th March 2020.
Substantiation of Claim 2.
As described in this book's pretext, the changes to the Epidemics Act were made via an emergency procedure in the Danish Parliament on 12th March 2020. This way the government circumvented the thirty days of processing which is requesite for changes in legislation which, under normal circumstances, ensures that spurious law-making is not carried out on a whim. The Director of the Health Board, Søren Brostrøm, is given directions in an email on 14th March 2020 to disregard the principle of proportionality, which would otherwise ensure an equal balance between professional medical ethics and the power enforced by the authorities. This email was sent by the Head of Department of the Ministry of Health, Per Okkels, where he writes that the Ministry of State is very "worried about why we test to such a small extent", and "if possible, the demand is that we carry on testing still more people". The email ends with a unmistakeable reprimand to disregard the principle of proportionality: "Before you reply, you must abandon the duty to exercise proportionality in recognition of the extreme principle of caution".
See this article in the Danish Magazine of Legal Professionals, which describe the wishes of the Ministry of State that the Health Board "shelve their professionalism": https://www.magisterbladet.dk/aktuelt/2020/maj/regeringen-til-sundhedsstyrelsen-laeg-fagligheden-paa-hylden
At the press meeting on 11th March Prime Minister Metter Frederiksen says: "And therefore it is the recommendation of the authorities that we lock down any unessential activities for a period".
In an open consultation in the "Committe for Procedures" about the basis for the government’s decision to lock down Denmark, on 9th June 2020, Mette Frederiksen explains why the decision was a "political decision". The consultation can be viewed on this link, 11 minutes in: https://www.ft.dk/aktuelt/webtv/video/20191/ufo/td.1665818.aspx?as=1#pv
Here she clearly states that the Danish government made a political decision and not a professional medical decision to lock down the country. At the same time, the emergency passing of the Epidemics Law is also made on a political basis and not a professional medical basis.
Claim 3:
Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen was not speaking the truth either to the Danish people or the parliament, when she claimed that there were recommendations from authorities that made her lock- down the country and set the emergency passing of a new Epidemics Act in motion.
Substantiation of Claim 3.
The existing law (Law no. 208 and BEK 1026 and 1444) which was valid until the new Epidemics Act was processed in November 2020. It obtained emergency approval, under chaotic circumstances on 12th March after Mette Frederiksen, the evening before at a press meeting, had effectively locked the country down on the grounds of the apparent massive spread of the new virus in Danish society. It appeared later on, that the Director of the Health Board, Søren Brostrøm, rejected the government’s claims that the new coronavirus outbreak was a valid basis for such far-reaching enforcements which the Epidemics Act had introduced, and that the Health Authority did not find any basis for a lockdown of the extent that took place.
This is why the government could not go ahead on the basis of the previous Epidemics Act and lock the country down in the way that it wanted and changes to the law were needed. These gave the Health Minister, Magnus Heunicke, a long list of far-reaching powers where he, without any recommendations from any health authorities or medical professionals, and without the consent of parliament, could enforce among other things the sectioning of 'patients', forced medical treatment and forced lockdowns upon Danish society. Until Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen officially informs the Danes and parliament which authorities recommended the lockdown of the country, her statements are to be regarded as false.
Claim 4:
The Danish population are not told the full truth about the effectiveness when using face masks etc. Women, men and children are given an artificial illusion to a heightened sense of security and safety when they are instructed to wear face masks. However this is a false sense of security and is not based on collected scientific evidence.
Substantiation of Claim 4:
The effectiveness of wearing a face mask, other masks and visors in order to protect against a virus is very dubious at best which becomes even clearer after going through the eight scientific articles below; several of these are publised on PubMed, the most recognised of all Professional Medical Databases. In the list below, the PMID number indicates the direct reference to the location of the particular study. Otherwise there is a link.
(NEJM) New England Journal of Medicine:
“We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection.”
PMID: 32237672
Journal of Life and Environmental Sciences:
“This study showed that the filtering efficiency of cloth face masks were relatively lower, and washing and drying practices deteriorated the efficiency.”
PMID: 31289698
Journal of Influenza & Other Respiratory Viruses:
“None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator use and protection against influenza infection.”
PMID: 22188875
American Journal of Infection Control:
“Face mask use in healthcare workers has not been demonstrated to provide benefit in terms of cold symptoms or getting colds.”
PMID: 19216002
Journal of Epidemiology & Infection:
“There is little evidence to support the effectiveness of face masks to reduce the risk of infection.”
PMID: 20092668
(BMJ) British Medical Journal:
“..laboratory confirmed viruses were significantly higher in the cloth masks group.. Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97%.. This study is the first RCT of cloth masks, and the results caution against the use of cloth masks. Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection.”
PMID: 25903751
University of Edinburgh:
“Conversely, surgical and handmade masks, and face shields, generate significant leakage jets that have the potential to disperse virus laden fluid particles by several metres. The different nature of the masks and shields makes the direction of these jets difficult to be predicted, but the directionality of these jets should be a main design consideration for these covers. They all showed an intense backward jet for heavy breathing and coughing conditions. It is important to be aware of this jet, to avoid a false sense of security that may arise when standing to the side of, or behind, a person wearing a surgical, or handmade mask or shield.”
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2005/2005.10720.pdf
(JAMA) Journal of the American Medical Association:
“Face masks should not be worn by healthy individuals to protect themselves from acquiring respiratory infection because there is no evidence to suggest that face masks worn by healthy individuals are effective in preventing people from becoming ill.”
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2762694
Claim 5:
The new legislation regarding the use of face masks leads, according to science, to real and potential harm to the women, men and children in Denmark who wear them for longer or shorter periods, as they believe that they are thereby protected against the new corona virus.
Substantiation of Claim 5.
Below are two scientific studies that deliver evidence of damage to health in connection with the wearing of face masks. Both can be found on PubMed using the PMID reference numbers.
Journal Neurocirugia (Neurosurgery):
“Preliminary Report on Surgical Mask Induced Deoxygenation During Major Surgery.. Our study revealed a decrease in the oxygen saturation of arterial pulsations (SpO2)”
PMID: 18500410
Journal Headache:
“ Title: Headaches Associated With Personal Protective Equipment - A Cross-Sectional Study Among Frontline Healthcare Workers During COVID-19.
Conclusion: Most healthcare workers develop de novo PPE-associated headaches or exacerbation of their pre-existing headache disorders.”
PMID: 32232837
An explanation of the consequencial medical effect of too high a level of CO2 and too low a level of oxygen, which has the medical term respiratory acidosis, can be read in the following article published in Medical News Today: “Respiratory acidosis develops when air inhaled into and exhaled from the lungs does not get adequately exchanged between the carbon dioxide from the body and oxygen from the air.”
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/313110
In the article above, the following symptoms of respiratory acidosis are listed: Headache, memory loss, sleep disturbances, panic attacks, changes in personality, confusion, docility, state of shock and sudden mustle contractions. In special chronic cases, respiratory acidosis can, according to the article, result in a drastically lower PH level in the blood and cause the following damages to human health:
- Reduced function of the heart muscle
- Disturbed heart rhythm and the cause of arrhythmia
- Lowering of the blood pressure
Summary of this COVID-19 Liability Claim
Hereby, the recipient of this COVID-19 Liability Claim is made aware of the five mentioned claims. By their taking part in the creation of the mentioned law and/or enforcements and/or precautions, which contributed in the instruction or coercion of women, men and children to comply with the laws regarding the use of face masks, BEK 1221, 1372, 1443 of 1460, the recipient assumes, enforced by this NoL, a profound and serious responsibility. This responsibility includes both the immediate damage to health as well as the potential future damages to health, which are imposed on women, men and children who are subjected to this instruction and coerscion. This responsibility also includes the eventual financial loss to women, men and children, instructed or coerced into complying with the laws mentioned. These areas of responsibility can include both the legal responsibility of a public servant - valid via their employment, position or title - and a civil responsibility as a man or a woman who can become the object of civil legal charges.
This COVID-19 NoL gives the recipient the option to take individual actions in order to end their participation, and thereby minimise their responsibility for the health, financial and other related consequences to humans who were forced to comply with the laws. Furthermore, we are pointing to the opportunity for the recipient to take part in informing other women, men and children of the illegality of the mentioned laws, which would be the cause of reduced legal charges, when and if the recipient is made responsible by being taken to court, for their participation in such illegal activities. The recipient is made aware of this knowledge via this COVID-19 NoL and this obligates the recipient to take action on the basis of the newly acquired knowledge, for example by refraining from mandating other people to wear face masks or refraining from being part of the reason why these mandates exist at all.
The recipient has the option to refute one or more of the five listed claims in writing, by sending their reply to the sender. The address of the sender is printed on the front of the document. Should the recipient opt out of this opportunity to refute the claims within fourteen days from receiving this COVID-19 NoL, then then this will taken to be the same as the recipient agreeing in silence to the five claims.
Sender's signature………
__________________________
Name (printed)
Witness 1 signature:
__________________________
Witness 2 signature:
________________________
An online version of this document can be found on the website (currently not available!)
www.danmarkvaagner.dk
Link to Inpower Movements international homepage:
https://www.inpowermovement.org/
The Danish Illusion is a reader supported publication.
If you do not feel like becoming a paid monthly subscriber, but want to support my work, you can buy me a cup of coffee for aprrox. 5 USD/35 DKK(click HERE!):
Share this post